Thomas Clarkson - A DOUBTFUL DEBT
Early in 1823 the ship "Marshall Wellington" came to
anchor in Sydney
Cove. The master of the ship, on seeing his crew swarm ashore for
leave, indemnified himself against all debts they may incur by
publishing a notice in the Sydney Gazette stating he would not be
responsible for the same.(53) This was the usual custom, and a
necessary one, as it ensured the onus was placed on the inhabitants, if
they gave credit to the seaman, to recover it from the perpetrator and
not his master.
On to these shores stepped young James Bee, an
allegedly illiterate
ship's cook. He made his way to the House of George Davey (an
acquaintance of Thomas') where he proceeded to drink out his wages. As
a result of this exercise he became so inebriated it was obvious he
would need board and lodging for the night. This was offered to him by
the host.(54)
Early the next morning, urged by George Davey and
Thomas Clarkson, he
signed a promissory note for £30. Davey made the note over to
Clarkson, who presented it to the Ship's Captain for payment. He
refused and the Captain immediately dispensed with the services of his
poor cook. The unfortunate Bee found himself in custody and
subsequently before the courts to face charges.
James Bee claimed that the House of Henry Hart, run
by George Davey had
been recommended to him, and that Davey had invited him to eat at his
establishment, which at intervals of sobriety, he did.(55)
His shipmates had followed him to the same location
and. having spent
all their ready cash, would leave their debts on his account. He could
support this if need be with the testimony of Edward Flaherty. Further,
he claimed, Flaherty could be questioned in relation to the promissory
note in question which, as Flaherty claimed, was organized and
signed….(56)
during
the heat of the defendant's intoxication, in a kind of private
apartment, in a clandestine manner and that another (note) which had
beep drawn up by one Mr Flaming, being disapproved, had been destroyed.
Bee was gaoled and left here in a strange country_
without sufficient
funds to pay the arrears.
The court considered the note more than a little
suspicious, and
rebuked Thomas Clarkson for not proceeding with the matter in the
recognised way when dealing with sailors whose Captains had already
advertised their indemnity of debts; the suit was dismissed.(57)
The question remains though, was Thomas really the
instigator of an
attempt to extort money from poor drunken Bee or did Bee leave himself
open to prosecution by incurring debts he couldn't
pay?
Ironically Thomas Clarkson was to find himself in a similar predicament
in May 1823. In retrospect it had all begun early in 1811. At this time
Thomas had entered into a "certain bond of obligation" by becoming a
joint bondsman with one James Bowler of Windsor for the payment of the
rent of the Turnpike between Parramatta and Windsor for one year.(58)
The right to collect the tolls was put to auction
and one Thomas
Boulton became the purchaser and prevailed upon Clarkson and Bowler to
share the payment of the rent of the same.
Shortly after Bowler died, leaving Thomas Clarkson
and Thomas Boulton
partners in the debt.
During the time he was operating the tolls, Boulton
was gaoled for some
misdemeanour and as he could not attend to the taking of the tolls, his
finances deteriorated and he was unable to pay the rents. At the end of
his yearly tenure of the Tolls, moves were made by the Trustees, D'Arcy
Wentworth and Simeon Lord to recover the cost of the purchased Tolls.
Since Boulton was in gaol and penniless, the proceedings against him
were ineffectual and so on 15 March 1820, these charges were duplicated
in suit against Thomas Clarkson, as surety, for the sum of £155.
On his release from gaol, Thomas Boulton joined
William Stewart's
survey expedition to Bateman's Bay and was allowed to leave the colony,
unnoticed and unannounced and was consequently never heard of again.
However, this was not the end of the issue,
Wentworth and Lord,
calculating that a debt of £1,000 was owing on unpaid Tolls,
directed their suit against Thomas Clarkson as the sole surety.
Judgement to this effect was issued on 18 October 1820 leaving Thomas
with the complete debt.(59)
On 26 May 1823 Clarkson composed a long letter to
the current governor,
Sir Thomas Brisbane. In this he included a detailed account of the
circumstances and claimed if "Thomas Boulton
had been detained from leaving the colony he would have eventually
become able to discharge the whole of the said claim against him" thus
indemnify Thomas. Now, threatened with the payment. Clarkson declared
himself incapable of discharging the amount of such a judgement.
Further, he declared, if payment were insisted of him, he was facing a
gaol sentence and this would leave his very large family without means
of support "deprived of his exertions to maintain them".(60)
Little was Thomas, or any other member of his very
large family to know
that within a year they would be forced to struggle on without his
support and efforts indefinitely. Within a year Thomas Clarkson would
be dead.
Page last updated - 7 July
2006