Catherine Clarkson - SWEET VICTORY

    Catherine, threatened with eviction, would not go peacefully, and if James Holt thought she was giving up, he was mistaken.
    The matter of the deed of title (or the grant) was still to be settled.
    In April the Surveyor finally reached Hunter Street to measure up the property. This was duly done and the ownership of "Cooper and Levey (late Clarksons)" was noted on the document and dated 29 April 1834.(70)
Description of an allotment of land lying and situate in the Parish of St Phillip (sic.) in the town of Sydney and County of Cumberland, the property of Cooper and Levey.
Bounded on the North by the South side of Hunter Street ninety links,-- on the West by the East side of Elizabeth Street, four chains and three links -on the South by the premises of Archibald McKellup bearing Easterly one chain eighteen links -- on the East by the premises of Bigge and McKellup, being lines bearing Northerly one chain forty links, making a Total of one chain seventy five links -- on the North again by a Westerly line of fifty six links -- on the East again by a Northerly line of one chain and sixteen links -- on the South again by an Easterly line of twenty links. The three latter lines bounding the Premises of the aforesaid McKellup and finally on the East by a Northerly line of eighty eight links (bounding Shaughenessy's premises) to the commencing North East corner in Hunter Street.
Contents Fifty Six Square Perches.
P.L. Bevin
Surveyor
29 April 18j4
Late Clarksons Premises.
The Parish was rightfully St James.
Who was the rightful owner of the Woodman?
The dispute was to be rekindled in the Court of Claims.
James Holt submitted his claim in a memorial recorded as No 395, dated 3 May 1834.(71) On 5 May, opposing memorials were received from four opponents.
1st Catherine Clarkson, Widow, Elizabeth St, Sydney.
2nd ditto
3rd Mountford Clarkson, Cabinetmaker, Castlereagh St, Sydney
4th Esther Bigge, Widow, Phillip St, Sydney.
    Catherine and Mountford were claiming that the portion at the rear of the brewery was not part of the original land and was not included in the mortgage. In all, they were dividing the property into two claims --
    One, the portions Catherine had purchased from Parks and Mary Bigge. Two, the portion Mountford claimed as his, at the rear of this.
    The memorial of Mountford Clarkson claimed ownership of the land, through the gift of it, in 1812 from his Godparents, Richard Harding and his Wife. The land had since remained in the hands of his mother as the natural guardian and trustee.(72)
    Harding was reputed to have bought the land from William Smith in November 1812. (William Smith, as previously mentioned, received the portion from his night of "carousing" with Stubbs, while Esther Spencer/Stubbs was absent).
    In 1813. Richard Harding and his wife, supposedly left for Europe, and in remembrance of them, they bequeathed the land to their Godson, Mountford. The land at that time was regarded as being worth very little.(73)
    Richard Harding was acknowledged as being young Mountford's godfather by various witnesses brought forward.
    Abraham Bateman, a Sawyer of Phillip Street, confirmed this evidence as did another witness, George Davey, who claimed to be present at the sale of Mrs (Mother) Stubbs' land to Harding. Thomas Evans, a pensioner in Pitt St, also swore to the stated evidence given by the others in Mountford's favour.(74)
    Catherine was to lodge two claims, numbered 535 and 536; one for the land she had purchased from John Parks and which she had enclosed, herself, with the permission of Governor Bligh, and the other for the land she had purchased from Mary Bigge in 1814. (see sketch of property). In this claim she refuted all claims that she had joined with Thomas in the mortgage to Daniel Cooper and she thereby refused to acknowledge the inclusion of her land in that same mortgage.(75)
…Daniel Cooper, merchant, who prevailed upon him (Thomas Clarkson) about 10 August 1822, to execute a mortgage for a sum of money pretended to be due .... and in which mortgage. he the said Daniel Cooper had caused the said land to he included, but your memorialist (Catherine) never joined in such mortgage, and never signed any deed or did any act to divest herself of the title to the said land.
Other witnesses listed in Catherine's defence;
Catherine, wife of Thomas Rowley, near Liverpool, Settler. Sarah Cooke, wife of Michael Cooke of Lane Cove, Settler. Thomas Evans, upper Pitt St. Sydney.
Ann Evans, wife of Thomas Evans ditto.
William Hill, Park St. Sydney, Publican.
Mary Hill, wife of William Hill, ditto.
James Connell, Castlereagh St. Sydney.
Michael Joyce, Clarence St. Sydney.
George Davey, George St, dealer.
    Memorial number 806 was from Esther Bigge of Phillip Street. In it she claimed she had received her land with the authorization of Governor Hunter in 1797 and had enclosed it with a fence and erected a house on it. At that time there was no division caused by Elizabeth Street. In the construction of this street, Bigge had to relinquish a small portion of her allotment, to accommodate the road.(76)
    She confirmed our earlier statement that a small portion of her land had been sold off to Smith by the man who was residing with her at the time, a man named Stubbs, but since he had no authority to sell it as they were not married, she considered the sale null and void. In 1822 she had married Joseph Bigge who was now deceased(77) and she now went by the name of Esther Bigge. This was obviously her last chance to recover the land she claimed had been virtually stolen from her.
    James Leek, a carpenter of Castlereagh Street, claimed he had boarded with Mrs Stubbs and that he was aware of the clashes that occurred over Clarkson gaining possession of the land. He claimed Stubbs and Mrs Stubbs had quarreled over the land, till the day Stubbs died.
    William Fleming, who had acted for Thomas Clarkson in legal matters over quite a number of years, had been present at three former trials of law suits over this property and it was only about 7 weeks ago, so he said, that he'd heard of the claim by Mountford Clarkson to the land. However, he did recall Catherine Clarkson saying some years previously that Mountford would one day build a fine house on the land. He went on to dispute the truth in the evidence given by Abraham Bateman as he recalled another occasion when Bateman had given evidence that was suspect.
    Lewis Soloman of Liverpool Road stated that when Mrs Bigge challenged Clarkson about the purchase of the land, he had told her to see Smith about it.
    Finally the Memorial numbered 395 from James Holt was tabled and from that came evidence that the accounts of the affairs of Clarkson and Cooper, contained in a book located in the office of Mr Norton, (a solicitor who often acted for Cooper), showed the progressive debts and payments. (78)
    There were 5 or 6 entries
"and after judgement against Clarkson, the 4 pages relating to this property are dated, 28 October 1820. 18 December 1822, 23 May 1826 and 9 June 1831".
    None of these, it was claimed, was fully satisfied. (The levy of £926/3/8 which had irritated Catherine so, had been acknowledged.)
    This claim of Holt's went on to state that the mortgage did indeed contain both portions of land that were now in dispute; the one originally bought by Catherine herself and the one claimed by both Mountford Clarkson and Mrs Bigge.
    Having considered the evidence of all sides and acknowledging that the dispute between the parties regarding the settlement of the accounts was not in their power to determine, the Commissioners at the hearing decided to pronounce;
that a deed of grant should be made of the whole premises in the names of Catherine Clarkson, widow and Thomas Rowley of Georges River, Settler., devisees under the will of Thomas Clarkson, late of Hunter Street Sydney, Deceased and to their heirs. Dated
                    28 August 1835(79)
    And so it was that Catherine finally won her first but ultimate battle in her long hard struggle to retain the only home she'd known since her arrival in the colony in 1806. Catherine was given the grant to the land, dated 8 February 1836.(80)
It was official, THE WOODMAN WAS HERS!
Image of Grant
Image of Maps

 Page last updated -  7 July  2006