1876 The Shift From Ballarat
Charles Martin's home page
- 1876.The Shift From Ballarat.
-
-
- A Traumatic and
Difficult Decade Begins.
- 10th January - The
Petition Commenced - The "Courier" Reports
- 28th January - TWO
FAREWELLS.
- A FAREWELL AT THE
SCHOOL.
- Farewelled by the
Church at Dawson St.
- 31st January. New School
Opened.
- SOME SIDE ISSUES.
- 1. The Reaction of the
Catholic Bishop.
- 2 The Saga To Raise Money
For The Children's Picnic.
- 3. Mr Armstrong.
- 1/2/76 - Senior Assistant,
Training Institution
- The Training Institute
- Some Background.
- From the Education
Department Correspondence (1876)
1876.The
Shift From Ballarat.
A
Traumatic and Difficult Decade Begins.
The year commenced with Charles still in charge of his
school - even though there were a number of others breathing
down his neck with at least twelve applications for the
position. The sequence of events is relatively clear. On 30th
December a letter was written to him offering him a position at
the Training Institute in Melbourne, and on the 7th January he
replied accepting this position. However, the opening date for
the new Dana Street School had been set for 31st January, and in
this three week period Charles, and others on his behalf,
engaged in some quite strenuous efforts for his retention at
Ballarat.
So far as
the records are concerned, it is a pity that the actual
correspondence for this period is
missing. We can, however, build up a reasonably clear picture of
events, firstly from a number of news items and letters
published in the Ballarat newspapers, and secondly from the
"Register of Inwards Correspondence" of the Education
Department. This was a large book, and as letters were received
at central office in Melbourne, the date of receipt was
recorded, plus a summary of the contents of the letter.
30th December - Letter forwarded to Charles offering him a
position as "First Assistant" at the "Training Institution" in
Melbourne (forerunner to the Melbourne Teachers College). The
position had become vacant as a result of the death of Mr
Hearle.
5th January - Charles writes to the department, calling
attention to improvements made to the residence, and requesting
compensation for expenditure.
6th January - A news item is published in the "Ballarat Star"
giving details of the opening of two new schools in Ballarat
Dana Street and Humffray Street. As the article is fairly
lengthy I will not reproduce it here, but it gives quite a lot
of detail regarding the new building and some of the background
to the situation. In regards to the "head mastership" of the
Dana Street School it states -
"It is not yet known
who will obtain the head mastership of the school, but
rumour has been very busy lately with the names of several
well-known schoolmasters. Still, as nothing definite can be
reported, it would be unfair to mention the names of the
gentlemen who are known to be desirous of occupying the
premier position. "
7th January - Charles replied to the "Training Institution",
accepting the position as "First Assistant".
Sir,
I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of
your letter of 30th Ulto inquiring whether I am willing to
accept the position of First Assistant in the Central
Training Institution, and to inform you that although my
wish has been to remain in the position that I have filled
for so many years, and that my removal from this place will
cause me serious inconvenience and loss, yet I am willing to
accept the offer of the Honorable the Minister of Public
Instruction.
I have the honor to
ask whether any allowance will be made towards the expense of
removal to Melbourne.
Respecting Mrs Martin, she is by this change to be deprived
of her employment, but after
twenty years incessant teaching, she is not at present
anxious for a fresh appointment, and trusts that she will
not, by this change in our position, lose any advantage that
may be secured to teachers by the anticipated New Civil
Service Act.
I have the honor to be,
Sir,
Your most obedient servant,
C.Martin, Head
Teacher.
Image
of Letter
His letter produced the following
memo -
1. Mr Martin will not be prepared to commence duty
until 1st Feb.
2. No expenses. The appointment is promotion.
Teachers who
were forced to transfer as result of the recent changes were guaranteed that if their salary drop was more than
10% they would be recompensed accordingly. Charles suffered a
slight fall, but as it was less than the 10% figure, he didn't
qualify.
He also
wrote on Friday the 7th on a more pressing matter -
Sir,
I have the honor to ask what I am to do with the children,
when they arrive on Monday
morning.
The German Lutheran building has not been released, and the
infants will fill the old school
room.
Please
reply by electric telegram.
And on the 8th he wrote again on a more practical matter (i.e. money), seeking
re-imbursement for 6 items of improvement to the teacher's house
Sir,
I have the honor to
direct your attention to the following improvements made by me in this dwelling house -
Bath - £5.16.9
Carpenter's work -
17.3
Wardrobe - £5.11.0
Drain - £3.15.0
Laying on Water -
£3.3.0.
Register stove - £2.10.
The Department is now using my drain and water pipe, the
supply and discharge pipes of the
urinal being connected with them. The bath and wardrobe have
improved the value of the house, and as the Minister now
charges rent, an increased sum may be obtained for it. There
are also an oven and a small cedar cupboard.
I trust that you will take these items into your favourable
consideration and make me some
compensation for the expenditure.
Image of Letter
8th January - From "The
Ballarat Star".
"As to the
opening of the new State schools in Humffray and Dana streets, it appears unlikely that the Humffray
street one will be opened with any ceremony, but the
Minister of Education is expected to be present at the Dana
Street school, which will probably be opened at the
beginning of next month. Mr Martin, we hear, has accepted an
appointment in the Melbourne Training School. He is one of
the old pioneers of Ballarat, and will carry away with him
the good wishes of a host of old friends here"
10th January - The
Petition Commenced - The "Courier" Reports
"Mr Martin, the head-master
of State-school No 33, Ballarat, has received instructions
to leave Ballarat in order to become first assistant-master
of the training school, Melbourne. Mr Martin has been
teaching in Ballarat for twenty-one years, and the report of
his departure is, therefore, much regretted by a large
number of families. A petition to the Minister of
Instruction will be got up during the week, asking that Mr
Martin may remain where he has so long resided, and where
his usefulness is warmly appreciated."
11th January - From the "Ballarat Star".
"A petition to
the Education Department praying that Mr Martin, of the
Doveton street State School, may be retained in Ballarat,
was being numerously signed on
Monday, but as Mr Martin has accepted a new appointment
under the department, it is hardly likely the petition will
be of much avail. It has been stated that Mr Oldham has been
or is likely to be appointed to the new State school in Dana
Street, but nothing has yet been done, nor is likely to be
done, for a week or two yet in the matter of that
appointment. All that is at present known is, that seeing
that Mr Martin has accepted another appointment, Mr Oldham's
chances for the Dana street appointment are in the first
rank. The emoluments of the head mastership of the Dana
street school are estimated at about £500 a year.
11th January - From the Ballarat "Courier".
"The petition to the Minister of Instruction, asking that
Mr Martin may remain at
the head of State-school No 33, Ballarat, and to which we
referred in yesterday's "Courier" was taken round the town
yesterday for signature. A large number of signatures (200)
were attached to it before night, the promoters meeting with
scarcely a refusal. We may state that no person has been
appointed to succeed Mr Martin, and that in the event of Mr
Martin being removed, the vacancy will not be filled by any
other teacher at present in Ballarat. "
12th January - A letter was received by the Education
Department from J. MacGowan requesting that a time may be
approved to receive a deputation from a committee in relation to
Mr Martin s removal from Ballarat. J. MacGowan was a member of
both the Dana Street School Committee and the Dawson Street
Church, being a loyal friend and supporter of Charles.
13th January - From the "Ballarat Star".
"The petition to
the hon. the Minister of Education for the retention of Mr Charles Martin as teacher in State school
No 33, has already been signed by nearly 500 of the
principal citizens in the city, and these are receiving
substantial additions daily. Mr Martin first opened this
school some twenty years ago, having been in government
employment for some seven or eight years previously, and it
is natural that his friends should not only wish to keep him
in Ballarat, but to see him appointed to the new school."
14th January - From the "Courier".
"Over 700 names
have been attached to the memorial praying the retention in Ballarat of Mr Martin, of the
Doveton street school. It is proposed to increase the number
of signatures to 1000, and to send a deputation to present
the petition to the Minister of Education. The secretary of
the movement has written to request that a day may be named
for the presentation. "
14th January - From the "Ballarat Star". A letter is published
from someone who signs himself "Justice", in opposition to the
petition circulating Ballarat in favour of Charles.
To the Editor of the Star.
Sir. - I would venture to ask you
to allow me to trespass on your valuable space with a few
remarks regarding the action taken by Mr Martin and his
friends as to the appointment at the Central School. Let it
be understood that I am sorry to say anything that may hurt
Mr Martin's feelings, but his action - or rather, perhaps,
that of his friends - does not appear straitforward and on
reflection he will doubtless regret the course he has taken.
As a matter of fair play to Mr Oldham, and the other
teachers who may be thought eligible for this important
situation, the following facts should be known, as the
public may otherwise be misled: - Mr Martin has, it is true,
been long at the head of the school in Doveton street, but
though having the best and most central position, he has
never had so large a school as Mr Oldham, nor has he
succeeded so well in gaining the confidence of parents or
produced better results. The certificates he holds are
inferior to Mr Oldham's, as he gained his honors under the
old system, when, as every teacher knows, the examination
was very much easier than under the new (under which Mr
Oldham passed. When the new school is opened, the Wesleyan
School in Dana street, and the Roman Catholic school in
Dawson street, will be closed, and both Mr Oldham and Mr
Spring have as much right to have their claims considered as
Mr Martin, for the school about to be opened is a new school
to take the place of three schools - not of Mr Martin's
alone. Mr Martin was offered and has accepted an appointment
in Melbourne much better than the one he now holds here. His
friends get up a petition, requesting that Mr Martin may be
kept in Ballarat, not, however stating as master of the new
school. This petition is signed by many who merely consider
that they are doing a goodnatured thing in trying to further
Mr Martin's wish to remain in Ballarat, but who would never
have signed such a petition had they thought that Mr Martin
was aiming at the post of head teacher of the new school,
and that they would thus be working against Mr Oldham and Mr
Spring (this has been admitted by several who signed); but
Mr Martin's friends have, through the papers, now shown what
their real object was, though they dared not openly avow it.
It is generally said that the two gentlemen who have got up
this petition are under great obligations to Mr Martin. The
origin of the movement is sectarian, as the said two
gentlemen both belong to the denomination of which Mr Martin
is the head in Ballarat. One of them is a member of the
Ballarat West Board of Advice, and I think, it will be
admitted that
a person holding that position should not take such steps to
endeavour to procure the promotion
of a teacher at the expense of others. If Mr Oldham choose
to get up a like petition, it is undoubted that he could
obtain many more signatures than Mr Martin, but it is a step
he would never take. He leaves the department to judge of
their respective merits (knowing that they are the only
competent judges), and there is little fear of their being
influenced by such a proceeding as Mr Martin's, but the
public, as before said, might be misled. Mr Martin has not
the shadow of a grievance; he has got promotion and a
position quite equal to his merits. It is a pity that he
should have stooped to any underhand proceeding.
Yours etc, JUSTICE.
(NOTE - Although this letter was obviously written by
someone in opposition to Charles, it is nevertheless very
interesting, and it appears to me that the writer has made a
number of telling points and has revealed quite a deal of
background information about Charles and the situation. His
point about the teaching qualification carries no real weight
(in my opinion), but some of the other points that he makes were
no doubt quite valid in the situation as it was at that time.)
15th January - From the
"Ballarat Star".
"We are informed that when Mr Martin entered upon his
duties as head-master of
the Dana street School, 20 years ago, there was a debt upon
the building of f300, which Mr Martin has paid out of his
own private purse, and has also paid one-half of all
expenses for school repairs and improvements as well as
furniture, including also the fencing of the reserve. The
holders of the petitions met with many who had been scholars
of Mr Martin's 16 or 17 years ago, whose children are now
attending his school, and they much regret his contemplated
removal. His school room has always been well-filled, and
lately far too much over crowded. Mr Martin's qualifications
and ability as a teacher are recognised by the department in
offering him an appointment in the Training Institute in
Melbourne."
15th January - "From the "Courier".
"The committee in connection with Mr Martin's retention in
Ballarat, viz Mr J. W. Gray,
J.P., Mr Henry Costin, J.P., Mr John Davey, Mr James Curtis,
and Mr J.T.MacGowan, met last night; Mr John Davey in the
chair. It was reported that the petition still continued to
be largely signed, numbers expressing themselves very
strongly in favor of Mr Martin. The following gentlemen,
namely, Messrs Gray, Davey, Curtis and MacGowan, were
selected to wait upon the Minister of Education and present
the petition. We are informed that when Mr Martin entered
upon his duties as head master of the Dana street school,.
twenty years ago, there was a debt upon the building of f300
which Mr Martin has paid out of his own private purse. He
has also paid one half of all expenses for school
requisites, including furniture and the fencing of the
reserve. The holders of the petition met with many who had
been scholars of Mr Martins sixteen or seventeen years ago,
and whose children are now attending his school, and they
much regret his contemplated removal. His schoolroom has
always been much filled, and latterly the scholars were much
inconvenienced by overcrowding. Mr Martin's qualifications
and ability as a teacher are recognised by the department,
as shown by it offering him an appointment in the Training
Institute in Melbourne."
19th January - Another letter to the
"Ballarat Star".
To the Editor of the Star.
Sir, - 1 think it is very
injudicious for the friends of Mr Martin and Mr Oldham to be
taking the steps they are at the present time, rushing into
print and getting up petitions in favour of their respective
candidates, thus trying to take the appointment out of the
hands of those best able to judge of a teacher's fitness for
the position. On looking over the educational reports for
some years I find that neither of the above gentlemen have
ever got very high percentages, from 55 to 60 being the
usual numbers - seldom above the latter - whereas I know of
other teachers in the district who have for years obtained
from 85 to 90, and the very best reports from their
inspectors, and one, at least, whose claims are in no way
inferior to those mentioned, and in whose favour I could, I
venture to say, get 7500 or 2000 signatures in the course of
a day or two. But we do not intend to take any such informal
steps, being content to leave the matter to an impartial
tribune, the Education Department, believing that the best
and the one most likely to make the school a success will be
selected. Yours etc,
" NO FAVOUR"
21st January. Petition presented to the Minister.
On Friday,
21st January, the petition was presented to the Minister for Education, and the following report appeared next
day in the "Star".
"A deputation composed of Mr J.W.Gray, Mr John Davey, Mr
MacGowan, and Mr James Curtis, was introduced this (Friday)
afternoon by the Hon C.J. Jenner, M.L.C., to the Minister of Education, for the
purpose of inducing that gentleman to retain the services of
Mr Charles Martin as a State schoolmaster at Ballarat.
In introducing the deputation, Mr Jenner stated that from a
communication that had been received
it was apparently the intention of the department to remove
Mr Martin from his present position, namely., master of No
33 School, at the junction of Dana and Doveton streets,
Ballarat, and appoint him to a position in the Central
Training Institute. This, he said, was against the wishes of
not only the parents of the pupils now attending Mr Martin's
school, but was antagonistic to the wishes of the most
influential inhabitants of Ballarat. He spoke confidently of
the abilities of Mr Martin after nearly twenty years
acquaintance, and trusted that the wishes of those who so
were so deeply interested in the matter would receive every
consideration at the hands of the department.
Mr Gray then presented a petition embodying the views of
over one thousand persons, and
whose signatures were attached, to the like effect; and read
from a paper a number of reasons why the services of Mr
Martin should be retained, amongst them being that when he
first took possession of the school there was a debt of £300
existing, which he had liquidated out of his private
resources, and for which he had received no remuneration
whatever beyond a slight reduction in rent charges. Mr Gray,
in the course of his remarks said that no complaint had ever
been made against either Mr or Mrs Martin; on the contrary
they had given the greatest of satisfaction, and were well
spoken of by every person in Ballarat with whom they had
been brought in contact as school teachers. They both held
departmental certificates, and if the intended alteration
was carried out Mr Martin's salary would not be increased,
however much his status in the service might be raised, for
with the expense of a residence in Melbourne and no
particular inducement held out to Mrs Martin, he would be
placed rather at a disadvantage than otherwise.
Mr MacGowan followed, and said the feeling largely existed
in Ballarat in favor of the
retention of the services of Mr and Mrs Martin. The
inhabitants there saw no reason why they should be removed,
and if the department wish to offer Mr Martin promotion it
could be done by giving him the charge of the new State
school, a position which he was peculiarly fitted for, as
must be evident from the manner in which his services have
been hitherto appreciated.
Mr Davey said the petition, although numerously signed,
would have been signed by three
times the number of persons if they had been asked, for both
parties were so well known and so highly respected. He said
it would be looked upon as a local calamity if they were
removed from the district.
Mr Ramsay, in reply to the remarks made, said he was fully
impressed with the importance
attached to securing the services of first class teachers in
the colony, but at the same time he wished it to be
understood that he would set his face against anything like
political influence being brought to bear on questions
affecting the positions of teachers. In this instance,
however, seeing that the petition was so largely and
influentially signed, he would confer with the officers of
the department and the Inspector-general, and see if
anything could be done to alter the decision likely to be
arrived at. He might state that nothing definite had been
done in the matter as yet, but in a few days after giving it
due consideration he trusted to arrive at a decision that
would give satisfaction to all the parties concerned.
Mr Jenner said that in introducing the deputation he had no
desire to give it any political
significance; for after many years acquaintance with Mr and
Mrs Martin he was confident in stating that not only were
the parents of the pupils anxious that their services
should be retained, but the bulk of the merchants, traders
and leading citizens were of the same opinion. Mr Ramsay
said he was confident that Mr Jenner had no desire to bring
his political influence to bear on a question of this
character; but, as the representatives of the Press were
present, he wished his opinions to be perfectly understood
by school-teachers and their friends. After a few remarks
from Mr Curtis with the same object in view, the deputation
retired, after thanking Mr Ramsay for his courtesy.
22nd January - A letter was received by the Education
Department from J. Oldham, the other main candidate for the
position of head master for the new school, remarking on "the
matter of the petition in favour of retention of Mr Martin". It
is a pity that we do not have the text of this letter, but Mr
Oldham is obviously drawing to the attention of the department
some of the facts mentioned by"Justice" in his letter to the
"Ballarat Star", and possibly also pressing his own claims for
the position.
23rd January - J. MacGowan forwards to the Education Department
a supplementary list of names to be added to the petition for
retention of Mr Martin.
23rd January - The "Courier".
"We have the best reasons for knowing that the head
mastership of the new
state-school No 33, Dana St, was offered on Thursday to Mr
Lennon, the master of the central State-school, Geelong, and
that, after 24 hours consideration, the offer was declined
by that gentleman. This shows the correctness of our
original statement, that no appointment had been made to No
33 when the petition with reference to Mr Martin was drafted
and signed."
24th January - The School Committee (the Board of
Advice) states in a letter to the department that it "has not in
any way interfered in the matter of Mr Martin's retention".
There was also a note in the "Courier" -
"It is stated in Saturday's "Argus" that the deputation
which waited on the hon,
the Minister' of Education on the previous day, with
reference to Mr Martin and State-school No 33, emanated from
the City Board of Advice. We are asked to state that the
deputation had no connection whatever with that body."
25th January - The "Courier".
"We hear that
the mastership of State-school No 33 has been offered to Mr James. Smith, the present master of the
Emerald Hill State school. "
25th January (approx) - Education Department Memo;
Appointment of Mr Armstrong.
It would
appear that on the 24th Mr Armstrong was offered the position and given two hours to make up his mind, as he is
reported in his speech on the opening day of the school as
saying that he had had but two hours notice of his appointment.
So after all
the jostling and to-ing and fro-ing, on about the 25th January Charles knew that he had lost the battle, and Mr
Armstrong was appointed. The competition had been so intense and
the interest so widespread that the teacher of a nearby school
(Bakery Hill) wrote to the Department requesting them to certify
that he had NOT applied for Headteachership of the new school.
All this
correspondence and newspaper reports are very interesting, indicating as they do that, despite the indifferent
report which he had received from the Inspector late in the
year, Charles had excellent support, and that many of the
parents of his school hoped that he would be enabled to stay. It
is obviously these incidents to which Charles was referring when
he wrote some time later in a letter to the Department -"I was
removed despite the expressed request of the citizens of
Ballarat that I be retained." It may also be asked why it was
that Charles wasn't retained, in view of the strong popular
support which he obviously enjoyed, as expressed by the petition
and deputation to the minister. There is, of course, no
indication anywhere in the correspondence, so we can only
speculate. It is possible that the authorities believed that
neither Charles, nor the other two Ballarat men, were up to the
job. It is also possible that they deliberately chose an
outsider to avoid controversy and ill-feeling .
25th January (approx) -
Charles writes that his daughter will remain in Ballarat.
26th January. The "Courier" Announces the New
Appointment
The head
mastership of State School No 33 is at length settled. Yesterday, Mr Ross, correspondent to the Board
of Advice, received the following telegram from the
assistant secretary of the Education Department: - "Mr
R.A.Armstrong has been appointed head teacher of the new
State-school at Ballarat". Mr Armstrong is at present
stationed at Richmond, where his qualifications as a school
teacher are spoken of very highly.".
28th January - TWO
FAREWELLS.
A FAREWELL AT THE SCHOOL.
Friday the
28th dawned hot and clear. It was to
be a sad day for Charles and Elizabeth - the day of the closure
of the school which had been their centre of activity and work
for nineteen years. A church farewell was also on their agenda.
A report appeared in the "Star":
The State school No 33, which has been under the head
mastership of Mr Martin
for the last nineteen years, was finally closed on Friday,
as from that time henceforward the children will assemble at
the new school, No 33, Dana street, and of which the formal
opening will take place on Monday next, 31st January. Prior
to the dismissal of the children, Mr Whitehead, chairman of
the local Board of Advice, with Mr MacGowan, who was also
present, made a short speech. He alluded to the formal
opening of the new State school, and said that Mr Spring,
who had been appointed assistant thereto, had been applied
to for a donation in aid of the funds required for the
opening treat to the children, to which appeal he gave a
direct refusal. Mr Martin, who, on that day concluded his
labors in the school, had given a handsome cheque towards
defraying the necessary expenses. He hoped that at nine
o'clock on Monday morning he should see every child in his
or her respective places and looking and behaving in a
manner that would be alike creditable to themselves and the
school.
He then called for three hearty cheers for Mr and Mrs
Martin, which were heartily, and
in many instances, tearfully given. Mr Martin briefly
responded, thanking them heartily. "It might be they were
glad to be rid of him, " but he took another view of the
matter, and was sincerely thankful for this expression of
their regret to himself and Mrs Martin.,
Mr John C. Corlett, pupil teacher, in conjunction with the Misses Harriet Sturley and Mary Jones, then
presented a handsomely engrossed address, of which the
following is a copy -
To Charles Martin, Esq, late headmaster of State school No
33, Ballarat. Dear Sir,
I have the honor, by direction of this school, No 33, to
convey to you and your family the following copy of a
resolution unanimously agreed to at a meeting of your
pupils held on the 24th inst., and respectfully to request
your acceptance of the same: -
'On the eve of your departure from Ballarat, as pupils
attending your school, and in
consideration of the benefits which we as well as our
predecessors have derived from the zeal, perseverance, and
ability which you have always displayed in discharging
your duties as head master of State school No 33 during
the last nineteen years, we feel called upon respectfully
to present to you our best thanks for your kindness and
attention to us in the past and good wishes for your
welfare in the future. It is with feelings of deep regret
that we have to part from you, knowing so well the value
of such an able master.'
Wishing you success in your new undertaking,
and long life and happiness to
yourself, Mrs Martin and family, I am, dear Sir, yours
very truly and affectionately, JOHN C. CORLETT.
With the above was presented an inkstand of silver, gold
pen, etc, and bearing a suitable
inscription, indicative of esteem and respect. A handsome glass vase of flowers was presented
to Mrs Martin, with numerous minor
tokens of esteem from scholars. Mr Martin briefly but
feelingly replied, and the school was dismissed, the
children taking an affectionate, and in many cases a
tearful, farewell. "
Farewelled by the Church at Dawson St.
At a farewell
function, apparently on the same day, but possibly on the
week-end, Charles was presented with an alabaster clock on an
oval wooden base, covered with a fine glass dome. This clock is
in my possession, being a family heirloom. Up until recently it
still kept good time.
The inscription on the clock
reads as follows -
"Presented to Mr and Mrs Chas Martin by the members of the
Church of Christ, Dawson St, on
their departure from Ballarat as a token of their love and
esteem and in remembrance of the many years of Christian
fellowship they have enjoyed together, as well as in
recognition of Brother Martin's faithful and devoted
services as pastor. January 28th, 1876."
I suppose
the farewell was a very serious and solemn occasion, with lots of prayers and speeches and giving thanks to God.
All the kids would have been done up in their best clothes (if
they had any best clothes in those days - I guess they did), and
warned to be on their best behaviour. No doubt they had a good
afternoon tea. Newspaper articles tell us that the weather was
very hot, as it can be in Ballarat in late January.
Nathan
Spielvogel, Ballarat historian and a later pupil and Head Master
at Dana St school recorded this
remembrance of Charles -"One of his well remembered customs was
that if a boy was to be whacked, another boy could volunteer and
take his punishment for him". Not difficult to discern some
Christian theology behind this.
At the time
of leaving, Charles was 48 years of age, and Elizabeth was 39.
Their children at home ranged in age from Charlotte 18, Leonard
13, Albert 11, Francis 8, Mary 6 and
Fred 4. Apparently Charlotte planned to stay in Ballarat.
Religion of course played a most important role in his life and
would have been central in his upbringing of his family.
31st January. New
School Opened.
On Monday
the 31st January, with much pomp and ceremony, the new Dana Street School was opened. A lengthy report of the
occasion was published in the "Ballarat Star'.
"Early on the morning of Monday 31st January noticeable
preparations were to be
seen in ail parts of the city in the shape of girls and boys
attired in holiday garb for the due celebration of the above
important event in their young life's history. On the
platform at the railway terminus, and awaiting the arrival
of the first train from Melbourne, were the Worshipful the
Mayor, and many other dignitaries. The Hon, Mr Ramsay, the
Minister of Education, and also Mr Armstrong the newly
appointed headmaster to the above mentioned school, arrived
by train and were driven off at once to the Royal Hotel for
breakfast. At eleven o'clock, the children attending the
State schools in the city, assembled to the number of one
thousand and five at the new building and having been
classified and their positions in the school indicated to
them, took their seats and awaited the arrival of the
minister, who in a short time was driven up to the
door. After
a short walk through the somewhat crowded building, Mr
Martin, late head teacher, briefly introduced the minister.
Mr Ramsay, addressing the ladies and gentlemen, boys and
girls, stated that he had had the
honor of being a member of the government that first
introduced the matter of free, secular, and compulsory
education. The educational movement was becoming wider and
wider, deeper and deeper, every day, and must continue until
every branch of the tree of knowledge had brought forth its
harvest abundantly . The movement had been copied by other
countries. Victoria had set an example to the world, and
even those who, for the sake of consistency, were originally
opposed to the movement, had changed, or rather, modified,
their views. He was pleased to see the fine building, and
assemblage of healthy and well-dressed children, and alluded
to the deep anxiety he had felt in the appointment of a head
teacher for them. He had been guided in the selection simply
by the earnest desire to have the very best man in such an
important position, and the selection was not to be
considered in any way a reflection on the local teachers,
but the contrary; they were removed to other scenes of
labor, and in removal had secured promotion.".
Then followed other fine speeches and ceremony, after
which the children were taken to the gardens for an afternoon
picnic, and the minister spent the day inspecting other
educational institutions in Ballarat.
Shortly
thereafter Charles and his family would have headed off for Melbourne - possibly even that same day on an afternoon
train, as his new appointment started the following day on the
1st February. I wonder how they got on transporting the clock,
and that glass dome. (My wife managed to drop it moving under
much more favourable conditions 100 years later). The next
twelve years, the years of his fifties, were to be traumatic,
difficult and unhappy in the extreme for Charles. Of course, he
wasn't to know this as he reluctantly headed off to Melbourne
and the future, disgruntled because his transfer had been forced
upon him, and probably somewhat apprehensive at the thought of a
new position after being in the one place for nineteen years.
Nearly three years later, after another enforced move, Charles
wrote of his transfer and the new
head master thus -
I have spent nearly a quarter of a century in the service,
and have been a great
sufferer through the present Education Act.
I had charge of the Central School, Ballarat for 19 years,
and gave universal satisfaction
to the parents and guardians.
Notwithstanding this, I was removed and a gentleman with a
lower classification, who has
handed over the teaching of his trainees to his 1st
Assistant, was sent in my stead.
My position in the Training Institute was given as an
equivalent for my situation in
Ballarat.
In little more than two years, I have twice been put to the
expense of breaking up my home,
and traveling a long journey with my family.
SOME SIDE ISSUES.
As I researched this
interesting period of time in January 1876 I came across some fascinating little sidelights . I will
pass them on to you.
1. The Reaction of the
Catholic Bishop.
On the hot
January afternoon when the children of the two Dana Street Schools were bidding tearful farewells to their
head masters, Mr Martin and Mr Oldham, the story at the Catholic
School in Dawson Street was vastly different. The three
newspapers each recorded the events - they speak for themselves.
a. The "Evening
Post".
"Where will intolerance end? To-day being the last occasion
upon which the children
meet separately in the State schools at Ballarat, the Bishop
and the Dean made it convenient to wait upon Mr Spring, at
the Roman Catholic State school - if we may be allowed the
term. These two reverend gentlemen first pointed out to the
teachers the enormity of the offence which they were about
to commit in accepting lucrative appointments under the
Government to impart secular instruction; all the horrors
likely to follow this diabolical course were vividly
depicted, and denunciation ad nausieam was poured upon their
devout heads. Then the little children were taken in hand.
They were ordered never to set foot inside the doors of the
abominable State school; they were admonished, cautioned,
and threatened in terms, and then the order was issued to
smash up a little testimonial which they had purchased as a
mark of the kindly esteem in which they held their head
teacher, Mr Spring. We do not want to ask awkward questions
but we should like to know the difference between this
action and tyrannical religious intolerance.
b. The "Ballarat Star".
"On Friday, that being the last day on which the children in
the state schools occupied
their respective buildings prior to the general merging into
one on Monday next, on the opening of the new Dana Street
state school, No 33; Bishop O'Connor and the Very Rev Dean
Moore were present at the school, presided over by Mr and
Mrs Spring, and cautioned the children against attending the
State school and denounced those teachers who had accepted
appointments under the government. A present from the
children to their teachers was forbidden to be presented in
public, but will most probably reach those to whom it was
intended as a mark of esteem and respect by private hands. "
c.
The "Courier".
"It seems we were wrong in stating yesterday morning that in
consequence of the
arrangements made with reference to State-school No 33, the
Catholic school in Sturt street will be closed on and after
Monday. There is no intention whatever of closing this
school, which will be carried on as usual.
Mr
Spring, late headmaster of St Patrick's school, has been
appointed first assistant in the
Central State school, No 33, and Mrs Spring third assistant,
but it is not known whether or no these appointments will
be accepted. The children of St Patrick's wished to
present an address and testimonial
to Mr and Mrs Spring before they left
the school with which they have been so long connected, but
they were not allowed to do this by the Very Rev. Deane
Moore. The rev. gentleman's action in this matter appears to
arise from Mr Spring and his wife receiving appointments in
the State school. The testimonial and address, however, were
last evening presented to Mr and Mrs Spring at their house
by the children."
2 The Saga To Raise
Money For The Children's Picnic.
It was decided that it would be a good idea to have a picnic in
the Botanical gardens on the day of the opening of the new
school. However, where to raise the money for 1400 children to
enjoy themselves proved to be quite a headache.
25th Jan - The
"Star".
"A deputation of the City Board of Advice waited upon the
council yesterday, requesting a donation of £50 towards entertaining the Minister of
Education, and giving a picnic to the children, on Monday
next, to commemorate the opening of the Dana and Dawson
streets State-school. Mayor Smith moved that £20 be given
towards the object, but this was opposed by other
councilors, and the motion was lost.
Friday, 28th Jan - The Evening Post.
"The Ballarat Board of Advice have communicated
with Mr R.A. Armstrong, the new
head teacher of the Dana Street state school, in order to
ascertain if he will aid in the proposed demonstration at
the opening of the school, but as yet have received no
reply. Mr Spring, the first assistant, at a salary of £350
per annum, has refused to subscribe a single penny.
Saturday, 29th Jan - The "Star".
"The idea of any demonstration at the opening of the school
on Monday has been
abandoned, as not sufficient funds are available for the
purpose. The money already collected, amounting to some £12,
will be returned, but if anything like enough money be
collected today a picnic on the gardens will be given to the
children. The newly appointed head master Mr G. Armstrong of
Richmond, and Mr Spring, of the Catholic school in Sturt
street, have declined to give anything towards providing a
day's outing for their future pupils, and so these latter
may have to content themselves with getting a holiday on
Monday. "
Saturday 29th Jan - The "Evening Post".
Mr Armstrong has signalised his appointment to one of the
most lucrative posts in
the gift of the education department, by a positive refusal
to assist in the proposed demonstration at the opening of
the Dana street State school. As a consequence of this and
similar refusals in other quarters the fete of the children
will not take place. Mr Armstrong telegraphs - "Can accept
no responsibility nor incur any liability for
demonstration." In what strong contrast to this is the
conduct of the head teacher of the Humffray Street school,
Mr E.J. Rosenblum?"
Saturday 29th - The "Star".
"Mr MacGowan made a short
speech. He alluded to the formal opening of the new State
School, and said that Mr Spring, who had been appointed
assistant thereto, had been applied to for a donation in aid
of the funds required for the opening treat to the children,
to which appeal he gave a direct refusal. Mr Martin, who, on
that day concluded his labors in the school, had given a
handsome cheque towards defraying the necessary expenses."
Courier - 31st - Reporting a Meeting held on Saturday
Evening.
"It had been
determined on Friday to let the picnic for the children fall through as no money could be obtained for
the purpose, but on Saturday evening Messrs Turner and
Diggles waited on Mr Whitehead, the Chairman of the Board of
Advice, in the matter. They promised to collect some money
for the required purpose, and in a short time over £3 was
subscribed by various persons. The money seeming to be so
easily obtained, Mr Whitehead thought that the remainder of
the necessary sum could be raised on Monday by collection,
and it was determined to give the children a picnic. Some
1400 have been provided for."
So all's well that ends well.
3. Mr Armstrong.
Mr
Armstrong appears to have been quite a character. Nathan
Spielvogel, a pupil at the school in
those days, speaks of him in his reminiscences -
"Mr Armstrong was unique. A
strict disciplinarian but with a keen sense of humor. He had
a swift left hand and a strong left arm. Many a frosty
morning he chased the whole thousand of us round and round
the yard, and woe to any legs that didn't get out of his
way. And I remember the fierce tug of wars on the asphalt
and our great headmaster running along and encouraging all
those who faltered in the struggle.
Once a month the boys, about four hundred strong, would be
marched in parade through the
city. First would come our noble head, bearded, bell-topped
and frock-coated. Then would come our fife and drum band,
all in uniform, playing a marching air, and then came the
small army swaggering along very proudly. Sometimes we would
be marched past Humffray street school then known as
Rosenblum's. Then the band played defiantly, then we tramped
our loudest as if in challenge, for you must know that
Humffray street and Dana street were mortal enemies.
Every Friday morning the school would assemble on the
asphalt and Mr Armstrong would
give us a long exhortation. I do not remember what these
sermons were about, but they must have been interesting, for
there were always crowds of folk hanging over the fence
listening to him. I remember one morning a man interjected
some remark. Our master boomed something at him. The man
replied. Mr Armstrong rushed to the gate. The man bolted.
There was a chase. The next thing we saw was our mighty head
master drawing him back to the assembly ground. There before
us all he gave him a dozen mighty whacks with his cane and
then using his boot with great effect sent him a whipped cur
out of the gate.
I doubt if Charles could have competed with
that.
1/2/76 - Senior
Assistant, Training Institution
Charles'
appointment at the Training Institute commenced on Tuesday, February 1st, the day after the big opening
ceremony at Ballarat. It is quite possible that he was required
to catch the afternoon train, and be in Melbourne the next
morning in order to start his duties.
The Training Institute -
Some Background.
At this
time, very few teachers attended training colleges, as most
served an "apprenticeship" by
becoming student teachers (known as "pupil teachers") under the
supervision of experienced teachers. The Pupil Teachers
themselves were often quite young (12 years of age) and had not
received much more education than some of the children they were
teaching. Thus, much of their teacher training consisted of
their own education.
The
thought or idea of a teachers' college was not well accepted,
and few elected to enter, in view of
the expense involved, and the fact that they would not be able
to earn a salary for the time spent at the college (plus the
fact that there was no certainty of a job once they finished).
During the
1870's, in addition to the principal, the Training Institute had
two Assistants, and some "special"
teachers (I'm not sure of their role - possibly they operated at
the level of classroom teaching in the model or training
school). The first Assistant was Charles Hearle, and the Second
Assistant was John Wilton. The work of these two men came under
attack in the mid-1870's. Some former students wrote letters to
the "Argus" newspaper criticising the Institute, and complained
that -
"the staff did little actual teaching but relied heavily
upon simply reading to the
trainees from text-books or requiring the trainees to read
them. The teaching is so poor and infrequent that the
trainees could do better by teaching themselves while still
earning salaries"
One writer
concluded by stating -
"1 have no
hesitation in stating that the attendance of the students at
the Training Institution at present is nothing more than a
solemn farce, so far as any
teaching - except from the special teachers - is concerned.
"
In fact
the Minister of Education was to criticise in Parliament the extremely academic and theoretical emphasis of the
Institute -
"If a
training institution be a place where a lot of young men and
women go to be crammed with a little
algebra, Euclid, history, Latin, and French, and also a
little English literature, then we have a training
institution. But I hold that that is not what is meant by a
training institution. What I understand as a training
institution is an institution where teachers go to learn all
the art of their profession, practically, theoretically and
philosophically - where they go to be trained m the art of
teaching. The Training Institution Is at present like a man
with one eye, and that the theoretical eye, while a
practical one would be far better.
Hearle,
the First Assistant, died in December 1875, his death coming at
an opportune time for Charles and he
was able to transfer into the resultant vacancy. He was,
however, entering into a situation which was already
experiencing many difficulties.
Charles took up his duties at the Training Institution on
1st February. No doubt he felt somewhat strange at first, but I
think he would have settled in reasonably quickly, and my belief
is that the work would have suited him very well, as he was
academically minded himself and highly literate. He taught, or
lectured, in Latin and Mathematics. Working with students at a
Teachers' College level would, I think, be more suitable for him
than with primary school children.
He rented
a house in Cardigan Street, Carlton, at No 4 Earnbank Terrace. This was quite close to his place of work as I
guess was necessary in those days. As it was also near the
centre of Melbourne, the rental was quite high, a fact to which
he refers in one of his letters to the Education Department. I
do know which school the children attended - nor even if the
older children attended any school. His eldest son Charles had
of course left home some years earlier and was living in
Melbourne (unless he was in Sydney); Charlotte stayed in
Ballarat at least for six months.
So far as
church affiliation in Melbourne is concerned, Charles linked up
with the Swanston Street Church of Christ. A search through the old records there contains no
mention of him or Elizabeth for the year 1876, hut by June 1877
he is recorded as chairing a board meeting, and from then on his
name occurs from time to time in the minutes and other records.
The following is also
recorded in the official history of the Swanston Street Church -
'A Mutual Improvement Society was
first mentioned in the 1871 minutes. It was established to
promote the intellectual moral and social culture of the
young people. Talents in reading, elocution and public
speaking were developed by means of essays, debates,
speeches and mutual criticism. Mr C. Martin, a
schoolmaster, was the first president of the society. Weekly
meetings were held for some years in the homes of members,
and later in the church hall. Many showed great improvement
and became acceptable public speakers. Occasional public
demonstrations were held."
In general, the emphasis of the Mutual Improvement
Society seemed (to me) to be very much on Christian topics
-,such as Bible debates, etc. One note in the minutes of 1877
says that - "Bro Martin then on behalf of the Mutual Improvement
Class asked if the church would give their countenance to a
weekly meeting for prayer and the study of the word, which was
agreed to. "
From the Education Department Correspondence
(1876)
February 4th - Charles
was granted re-imbursement for some of the items about which
he'd written earlier (drain, laying on of water, stove). Mr
Findlay, Public Works Inspector, was asked for his opinion. He
wrote - " I consider that taken altogether there is fair value
for the sum charged".
February 22 - But compensation
was refused for bath and wardrobe, so Charles wrote -
Sir,
I have the honor to
acknowledge the receipt of your letter of yesterday
declining to allow compensation for a bath and wardrobe
placed in the teacher's residence at State School No 33, and
to request that the voucher relating to these items may be
returned, and also to ask whether you have any objection to
my removing the bath and wardrobe from the premises.
Image
of Letter
Charles was given permission to
remove the bath and wardrobe, but Mr Armstrong back at Dana
Street wasn't too happy about it, so Charles wrote again to the
Department on March 1 1.
Sir,
I have the honor to acknowledge
the receipt of your letter of 9th inst, granting me
permission to remove a bath and wardrobe from the teacher's
residence attached to School No 33, and to request that you
will intimate to the Head Teacher of that school that I have
this authority.
Image
of Letter
Mr Armstrong was "intimated to" that
Charles had the authority to remove the
bath and basin, but he still wasn't at all happy about this and
wrote a long letter of complaint, stating that the removal of
the bath will give a problem with the pipes connected to it, and
that the wardrobe is really a semi attached fitting. In fact, Mr
Armstrong wasn't very impressed with the condition of the
residence, and demanded many repairs and alterations which were
eventually granted to him. But no doubt Charles was able to
remove the bath and the wardrobe, as permission had been given
to him. So at least he won that small round
March 25th - Charlotte wrote asking for an assistantship.
This letter has not survived, but as this was at Dana Street
School it indicates that she remained in Ballarat when the rest
of the family left.
If you have additions or
corrections to this page, please contact
us Bones in the Belfry home page
Page
last
updated
-
5 May 2014