Elizabeth Selwyn
Parents
Possibly
Thomas Selwyn and Mary
King
or
John Selwyn and Betty
Bird
Elizabeth Selwyn (b abt 1772 Gloucestershire, arr 1792 Pitt,
children by Thomas Rowley, d
1843 Kingston House, Newtown).
Isabella Rowley (b 1792 Sydney Cove, m William
(Lieut) Ellison 1807 Sydney Cove, d 1808 Sydney)
Thomas Rowley
(b 1794 Sydney NSW, m Catherine
Clarkson 1818 Christ Church, Castlereagh, d 1858 Minto).
John
Rowley (b 1822 Minto NSW, m Mary
Jane (Jane) Onslow 1846 Liverpool, d 1909 Pertersham)
John Clarkson Rowley (b 1847
Liverpool, NSW, m Sarah Jane Smart
1874 Beechworth Vic, 1928 Bethanga)
Joseph Smart
Rowley (b 1875 Yackandandah Vic, m Eircell Broome 1909 Albury NSW, d
1957 Bethanga)
John Rowley
(b 1797 Sydney cove, m Sarah Pear 1819 St John's, Paramatta, d 1873
Scone NSW)
Mary Rowley (b 1800 Kingston House Newtown, NSW,
m John Lucas 1817, d 1869 Nunima, NSW)
Eliza Rowley (b 1804 Kingston House, m Henry Sparrow Briggs
1826 St Johns, Paramatta, d 1882 Kingston)
This page now consists of three
distinct parts
The standard tree and links above.
A
writeup of the Elizabeth Selwyn story as I see it.
A collection
of correspondence and research notes that provides discussion and
evidence for the preceeding story.
Its not quite
Romeo and Juliet, but
Elizabeth's story is the only “girl meets boy” story we can
offer
from the dusty pages of our early family history. But starting
at the
beginning......
We have no clear knowledge of
Elizabeth's family or life in England. We first encounter her in
court. Quoting Ian Ramage in his Cameo of Thomas Rowley:
Her crime was reported in the
Gloucester Journal of 28 March:“At our
assizes last week, Thomas Creed, for stealing 5 fleeces of
wool,
Elizabeth Selwyn, Ann Mose and Judith Cowley, for sundry
thefts, were
sentenced to seven years transportation.”
Creed and Cowley were also
transported on the Pitt.
In the Calendar of the Prisoners
in the County Gaol for the Epiphany Sessions, 11 January,
1791, it is
recorded that Elizabeth Selwyn was aged 18
The
voyage on the Pitt must have been a nightmare. 402
convicts,
including 58 women were on the Pitt when she sailed from
Yarmouth Roads on 17 July.1791. Dr Smee in a book lists 2
Officers,
19 Naval Military, 4 Free persons, 10 soldiers wives, 1 convicts
wife, 2 free children, and 5 convict children. This comes to 445
plus
crew starting the voyage. Elizabeth Selwyn is listed among the
convicts. The only figure for the for the size of the Pitt I
have
been able to find is a weight of 775 tons. However I found a
ship of
that time of 445 tons which was 119 feet by 30 feet. So the Pitt
would have fitted comfortably on our block at Stanhope
Grove. Smallpox appeared shortly after departure, and 15
prisoners had died by the time she touched at St Jago
(Santiago).
Despite it being an unhealthy season in the Cape Verde Islands,
sailors and soldiers were allowed ashore. The Pitt experienced
calms
and incessant rain in the Doldrums, and made scarcely any
headway for
a month. The prisoners developed ulcers and scurvy but otherwise
remained relatively healthy. However among the military guards
and
their families, and the seamen, malignant fever appeared, and is
said
to have caused 27 deaths in a fortnight. Her crew was so
depleted
that in later gales convicts had to be recruited to help
navigate
her. By the time the Pitt reached Rio de Janeiro in October, 13
soldiers, 5 soldiers wives, and 13 seamen had died.. Elizabeth
Rowley
was one of the deaths. Overall there was one convict death on
the
voyage for every eleven convicts embarked. The Pitt arrived in
Sydney
on 14 February 1792 after a voyage of 212 days.
The voyage must have been a nightmare
for Elizabeth. She would have been confined below deck for 24
hours a
day in extremely crowded conditions with probably a short
exercise
break above deck each day.
Elizabeth was assigned to Thomas
Rowley on arrival in Sydney. Quite possibly on Valentine's Day –
thats a nice touch. As second in charge of the colony, Thomas
could
take his pick. But from Elizabeth's point of view it must have
been
attractive after the ordeal of the voyage. And it seems to have
worked out well. In 1794 she received a very early absolute
pardon,
so was then a free citizen, She never married Thomas, but that
was
probably pretty common in a society run by soldiers and
consisting
mainly of convicts and ex convicts. She would have been accepted
socially. It would be a brave person to snub an associate of the
second in charge of the colony. Though perhaps there was a
little
“Married Wives Club”?
Elizabeth would have enjoyed the
substantial houses that Thomas built at Kingston Farm and
Burwood
Farm. And I would imagine, have servants working for her
(probably
convicts?). She did not accompany him in his 8 month stint as
stand
in Governor of Norfolk Island in 1799,
In 1792 Elizabeth Selwyn has the
first of five children she has with Thomas. This was exactly
nine
months after the Pitt arrived in Sydney so probably her status
as
common law wife was organised on the Pitt before arrival in
Sydney.
Elizabeth received an absolute pardon in 1794,
Thomas retired from the army in 1801
on grounds of ill health and died of consumption in 1806. His
will
provided for Elizabeth and their five children.
“ in special trust for the benefit
of my five natural children begotten on the body of Elizabeth
Selwyn,
namely Isabella Rowley, Thomas Rowley, John Rowley, Mary
Rowley and
Eliza Rowley ... in common with the said Elizabeth Selwyn,
their
mother ... so long as the said Elizabeth Selwyn shall continue
sole
and unmarried and does not live in a state of cohabitation
with any
man ... but in the event of the said Elizabeth Selwyn forming
connexion with any man so as to live with him in a state of
co-habitation or marriage she is forever afterwards to lose
and be
deprived of this allowance ... whereas if the said Elizabeth
Selwyn
remains single she shall be entitled to receive her due share."
Elizabeth continued to live in the
family homes till she died in 1843., aged 71. I cannot find the
reference, but I have a recollection of Elizabeth making a
substantial donation to St Phillips, the establishment church of
the
time. This would indicate she was well accepted socially
An interesting snippet
has turned up in 2023
concerning Simeon Lord. But first a thumbnail sketch:
Simeon
Lord arrived in the colony in August 1791 with nothing but a
seven-year sentence. He was assigned to Captain Rowley and
endeared
himself to that gentleman by making money for him, and also,
in a
quiet way, for himself. When he was freed he owned two houses.
"A
History of Australia'', Marjorie Barnard, p 125
DNA
Testing and Ancestry,com research appears to show pretty
conclusively
that Elizabeth's fifth child Eliza born in 1804 was fathered
by
Simeon Lord not Thomas Rowley. The evidence is also clear
that the
first four children were not fathered by Simeon Lord. Thomas
was in
poor health by 1803-4. He retired from the NSW Corp in 1801
on
grounds of ill health and died of consumption in 1906. Did
Thomas
know? Suspect? Or care? Even Elizabeth might not have been
sure of
the father.
Detailed correspondence, discussion
and
research notes follow the above statement of the story as I see
it.
Les Rowley
In 1791 in Gloucestershire, Elizabeth Selwyn was
sentenced to transportation for burglary, stealing 32 shillings
sixpence worth of goods. in conjunction with Elizabeth Evans. On
arrival in Sydney in 1792 she was assigned to Thomas Rowley, by whom
she bore five children..It seems likely that she bore a 6th child by
Thomas in 1806 after he died. See the discussion on Thomas Rowley's
page. Elizabeth lived till 1843, having seen her children Thomas,
John, Mary and Eliza become prosperous citizens in the new colony.
In her later years, would Elizabeth have looked back and reflected
that getting nicked all those years ago in Gloucestershire was a
lucky break? Even though she had the means, in later life she never
went back to England. But that could have been simply that a ship
voyage would be unappealing after her nightmare voyage from England?
See comments on the Pitt voyage in the Thomas Rowley page.
.Elizabeth would have been the formative influnece on the children,
as Thomas died when they were young. His main contribution may well
have to leave them the Sydney properties
One of the provisions of Thomas Rowley's will was that "so long as the said Elizabeth Selwyn
shall continue solo and unmarried and does not live in a state of
cohabitation with any man then she shall be entitled to and
receive one sixth share". There is a statement in the book
"Thomas Clarkson If Only" that states that "Elizabeth Selwyn did forfeit her
income from the trust after Thomas’ death, by living with Abbott
Osbourne, a convict who had been assigned to her husband".
The reference given is Archives Office of NSW Court of Equity
7/3424. On requesting this file from NSW State Archives, it appears
to contain nothing to do with Thomas or Elizabeth. So little that
they generously gave me my money back. Pam Fulton also emailed me
expressing strong doubts about the Abbot story, As she says, "someone has interpreted lived with in
a more modern context" In those days, most people
lived with convicts. So we will leave it there unless someone can
produce a "smoking gun".
Elizabeth's Indictment, quoted from Ian Ramage's Cameo
4.06 Among the
convicts listed in the convict indents for the Pitt was
Name:
Selwyn, Elizabeth
Where
Sentenced: City Gloucester at Gloucester
Date:
23rd March, 1791
Term:
7 years
4.07 Her crime
was reported in the Gloucester Journal of 28 March:
“At
our
assizes last week, Thomas Creed, for stealing 5 fleeces of wool,
Elizabeth Selwyn, Ann Mose and Judith Cowley, for sundry thefts,
were sentenced to seven years transportation.”
Creed and Cowley were also
transported on the Pitt.
4.08 In
the Calendar of the Prisoners in the County Gaol for the Epiphany
Sessions, 11 January, 1791, it is recorded that Elizabeth Selwyn
was aged 18 and her companion, who was found not guilty, 16. They
were committed for trial by “P. Hawker, Clerk” on 14 December,
1790 on suspicion of stealing – “grand larceny and burglary” -
with Elizabeth Selwyn convicted of the lesser crime of grand
larceny at the Lent Assizes, 1791. According to the record, she
was sentenced “to be transported beyond the seas for seven years."
4.09 The
indictment reads:-
“Gloucestershire - The Jurors for
our Lord the King upon their Oath present that Elizabeth Selwyn
/Guilty of the simple felony only - To be transported beyond the
seas for seven years/ late of the parish of Cherrington in the
county of Gloucester spinster and Elizabeth Evans /Not guilty/
late of the same spinster on the fifteenth day of September in the
thirtieth year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord George the third
King of Great Britain etc about the hour of one in the Night of
the same day at the Parish aforesaid in the County aforesaid being
in the Dwelling House of one James Brown there situate one cotton
gown of the value of fourteen shillings four yards of striped
serge of the value of five shillings two pairs of women's shoes of
the value of three shillings one woman's hat of the value of
sixpence one serge cloak of the value of three shillings one pair
of scissors of the value of sixpence one linen shift of the value
of one shilling one holland shirt of the value of two shillings
two pairs of stockings of the value of two shillings three linen
caps of the value of three shillings and two yards of ribband of
the value of sixpence of the goods and chattels of the said James
Brown in the said Dwelling House then and there being with force
and arms feloniously did steal take and carry away and that the
said Elizabeth Selwyn and Elizabeth Evans being so as aforesaid in
the said Dwelling House and having committed the Felony aforesaid
in manner and form aforesaid They the said Elizabeth Selwyn and
Elizabeth Evans afterwards to wit on the same day and year
aforesaid about the Hour of two in the Night of the same day with
force and Arms at the Parish aforesaid the same Dwelling House
then and there feloniously and burglariously did break to get out
of the same against the form of the statute in such Case made and
provided and against the peace of our said Lord the King his Crown
and Dignity.
Elizabeth Evans
"Elizabeth's
accomplice was Elizabeth Evans.
Was she sent to NSW?
If so, did they keep contact and were they a part of each others
lives?
Are there any researchers of Elizabeth Evans?
Do these researchers have info on Elizabeth Selwyn that we
don't?
We may be able to help Elizabeth Evans researchers - if there
are any."
Bob Venn
Search of Ancestry.com.au Convict Register shows no Elizabeth
Evans - L Rowley
Elizabeth Selwyn's Indictment from Vic
Douglas
Note Elizabeth Evans only got one month, so
did not come to Australia from this conviction at Least
Elizabeth's Birth and Parents
Family
search gives us possible birth and parents for Elizabeth
Entry
1 - Ancestral file entry submitted by Richard Metcalf,
5 Imperial Ave, Emu Plains 2750 NSW
birth - 1775 Cherrington, Gloucestershire
- parents Thomas Selwyn and Mary King
married Thomas Rowley 1791
death 1843 Kingston NSW
Entry
2- Family Group Record also submitted by Richard
Metcalf
Thomas Selwyn
birth - 1741 Minchin Hampton, Gloucestershire and Mary King
birth - abt 1745 Avening, Gloucestershire, married 31 Jan 1766
Gloucestershire\
possible parents
Entry
3 - submitter unknown. Entry 2 marriage is at
Minchinhampton
Entry
4 - Pedigree Resource file entry similar to entry 1
From Ms Jeanette Mary EGAN
109 Old Glen Innes Road,Waterview Heights
Mail: P.O.Box 315, South Grafton NSW 2460 mobile:0413719771
Entry
5 Thomas Selwyn birth - 1741 Painswick,
Gloucestershire and Elizabeth Humphries married 26 Jan 1766
Painswick
possible parents
Entry
6 Elizabeth Selwyn married 1799 Painswick
How does the
above fit with known facts
Date
of Birth - Elizabeth was recorded as 18 on 11 Jan 1791
(Cameo 4.08 above)
This would have her year of birth as
probably 1772
Geography-
Cherington, Avening and Minchin Hampton are all within two miles
of one another
Painswick is only six miles to the north
Siblings
- Family search gives no children for Thomas and Mary, nor for
Thomas and Elizabeth
Conclusions
(1) Elizabeth was probably
born in the little cluster of towns including Cherington
(2) No
suggestion for her birth seems to be based on Parish records (no
date within year), ie they are just educated guesses
(3)
It is only Entry 6 that stops Entry 5 from being a really good
candidate
(4)
The lack of children for either marriage in Family search in a
way is encouraging. It is much better than finding a family that
does not have an Elizabeth
(5)
As there are a few Selwyn families in the region in family
search as well as the above, Entry 1/2/3 is only a warm
favourite. My bookie is giving even money
(6)
The suggestion that Thomas Rowley married Elizabeth is wrong.
There was a wife Elizabeth on the Pitt who died. Thomas is
believed to have taken her as mistress when the Pitt landed in
NSW in 1792 (on Valentine's Day - nice touch Thomas!)
Email from Rhonda Kroehnert, January 2012
Just doing a hunt around the
'new' Family Search website and I think the following are
excellent candidates for the family of Elizabeth Selwyn, all at
parish of Kings Stanley, Gloucester (near Cherington).
John Selwyn married
Betty Bird 25 April 1763 parish of Kings Stanley,
Gloucester
Issue:
Ann, christened 28
January 1764, father John Selwyn, residence
Gloucester (died 26 November 1769).
John, christened 21
April 1765, father John Selwyn, residence Gloucester.
Elisabeth,
christened 1 June 1766, father John Selwyn, residence
Gloucester.
Sarah, christened 21 May
1768, father John Selwyn, residence Gloucester.
I really feel this is our
Elizabeth. I don't know if you have seen a copy of the
original burial of Elizabeth Selwyn but it states she was 78
years which fits nicely with the Elisabeth above baptism date.
I know on your website it
is stated on the Calendar of Prisoners that she was 18 years
but I suspect she gave incorrect information, maybe to assist
in getting a lesser sentence! If this is our Elizabeth, and we
know that she was known as 'Betsy' Rowley in the colony, her
'mother' may also have been known as 'Betsy'. I have a friend
going to Salt Lake City in April, I will get her to copy the
original marriage of John Selwyn & Betty Bird, who knows
it may read 'Betsy' not Betty.
Also, another clue is that
she named one of her sons John (maybe after her father)!!!
The only thing
that may 'throw a spanner in the works' is that there is a
marriage of a Betty Selwgn [sic] married 14 August 1782 to
Thomas Harris at Minchinhampton. This could be the Elisabeth
below who would have been 16 or 17 years at the time;
possible!!
Comment Les Rowley
Now we have two
good candidates, so I have put them both at the top of the
page. Opinions anyone.. King Stanley is six miles from
Cherrington.
Acknowledgements
Ian Ramage's Cameo is the authoritive
document.
An email from Peter Myler prodded me into the Family Search
research above.
Vic Douglas for the Indictment above
If you have
additions or corrections to this page, please contact us
Bones in the Belfry home page
Page
last updated - 2024