Anthony Rowley and Mary Dennis
Parents :
Anthony's parents not known
Henry Hanford and Margaret
Hodsen (80%)
Anthony Rowley (b abt 1684, m Mary Dennis 1706
Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey)
Mary Dennis (b Mary Hanford 1675 Richmond Surrey)
Elizabeth Rowley (b 1707 Kingston
Upon Thames)
Anthony Rowley (b 1709 Kingston
Upon Thames)
Hanford Rowley (b 1711 Kingston
Upon Thames, m Anne)
Sarah Rowley (b 1714 Kingston Upon
Thames)
George Rowley
(b 1717 Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, m Elizabeth Friend 1739 Godalming, Surrey)
Thomas Rowley (b 1747 Kingston Upon
Thames, children by Elizabeth
Selwyn, d 1806 Kingston House, Newtown NSW).
Thomas Rowley II (b
1794 Sydney NSW, m Catherine Clarkson
1818 Christ Church, Castlereagh, d 1858 Minto).
John
Rowley (b 1822 Minto NSW, m Mary Jane
(Jane) Onslow 1846 Liverpool, d 1909 Pertersham)
John
Clarkson Rowley (b 1847 Liverpool, NSW, m Sarah Jane Smart 1874 Beechworth Vic, d
1928 Bethanga)
Joseph Smart Rowley (b 1875 Yackandandah
Vic, m Eircell Broome 1909 Albury NSW, d
1957 Bethanga)
The visitor to this page should be aware that
the Thomas to George link is speculative as is this page
Les Rowley
Bob Venn's Chronology
Early Mar 07, I received a letter from
Bob Venn. He followed the same trail to Anthony, then supplied the
following chronology (slightly modified). Early parts of the
chronology came to Bob from Janice Pond
1664 Henry Hanford
married Margaret Hodsden 26 Apr 1664 Mitcham Surrey (=LDS)
1671 Henry Hanford
bapt 12 Feb 1671 Mitcham, father Henry Hanford (=LDS)
1675 Mary Hanford
bapt 17 Oct 1675 Mitcham, father Henry Hanford (=LDS)
1684 (abt) Anthony Rowley bapt (=LDS)
1696 Mary Hanford and
George Dennis marry, St George Southwark
1697 Ann Dennis
chr 21 Mar 1697 Kingston Upon Thames, father
George Dennis (=LDS)
1701 Hannah
Dennis chr 15 Oct 1701 Independent, Kingston Upon Thames,
father George Dennis (=LDS)
1703 Elizabeth Dennis
chr 14 Apr 1703 Independent, Kingston Upon Thames,
parents George and Mary Dennis (=LDS)
1704 Hanford
Dennis chr 04 Oct 1704 Kingston Upon Thames, parents
George and Mary Dennis (=LDS) - Hanford died 1705 (=LDS)
1706 George Dennis
buried 7 Feb 1706 Kingston (=Family History Online)
1706 Anthony Rowley
(of Kingston Upon Thames) marries Mary Dennis 22 Dec
1706 (=LDS)
1707 Elizabeth Rowley chr
29 Oct 1707 Kingston Upon Thames, parents Anthony and Mary
Rowley (=LDS)
1709 Anthony Rowley chr 23
Nov 1709 Kingston Upon Thames, parents Anthony and Mary
Rowley (=LDS)
1711 Hanford Rowley chr 29
Aug 1711 Kingston Upon Thames, parents Anthony and Mary
Rowley (=LDS) (Bob had Malden SRY)
1714 Sarah Rowley chr 10
Feb 1714 Kingston Upon Thames, parents Anthony and Mary
Rowley (=LDS)
1717 George Rowley chr 24
Jul 1717 Kingston Upon Thames, parents Anthony and Mary
Rowley (=LDS)
Comments Les Rowley
(1) Mitcham is 6 miles east of Kingston on Thames
(3) Richmond is about 3 miles N of Kingston on Thames
(3) Southwark is a long way from Kingston - it is almost to
Greenwich
(4) What is the source of the 1696 marriage?
(5) My bookie is giving 4 to 1 on that Mary Hanford (born 1675) is
the person who married Anthony Rowley
Research Notes
I
have been in contact with Geoffrey Rowley, who is a descendant of
Hanford Rowley, above
Some other stuff I found (Les Rowley)
1630 Henry
Hanford chr: 03 Oct 1630 Wigmore, Hereford (=LDS)
1632 Margaret Hodsdon
chr 06 Jun 1632 St Marys, Watford, Hertford (=LDS)
1688 Mary Dennis
chr 07 Jan 1688 Richmond, , father Charles Dennis (=LDS)
1692 Ann Dennis
chr 28 Aug 1692 Richmond, father George Dennis (=LDS)
1697 George
Dennis chr 14 Nov 1697 Richmond, father George Dennis (=LDS)
1706 George
Dennes married Frances 1706 Kingston Upon Thames (=LDS)
1707 Mary Dennis
chr 03 Feb 1707 Kingston Upon Thames, parents George and
Frances Dennis (=LDS)
Comments Les Rowley
(1) The christening for Mary Dennis looks a good try for our Mary
on geography, and age (18) at marriage . The trouble is that son
called Hanford born in 1711
(2) The Henry and Margaret christenings are geographically remote
from each other and Kingston on Thames, but are possibles
(3) The Richmond Dennises seem to be clearly a separate family
Some Rowley Wills
Glenis Crocker supplied some wills that might
relate to the above family
Thomas Rowley late of the
city of Bath, writtem 1768, died 1775)
Dr Peter Le Fevre, a Historian who is
writing a book on the Admirals Rowley emailed correcting my
misreading of the will and supplied a lot more information :
Thomas Rowley of Bath was
actually the brother of Admiral Sir William Rowley
(1690-1768) and the uncle of Admiral Sir Joshua Rowley
(1734-1790). The persons mentioned in his will are Clotworthy
Rowley, Colonel Rowley and William Rowley.
Their father was
Admiral Sir William Rowley 1690-1768 and he had 4 sons
Thomas
Rowley (1728- after 1771), never married
CLOTWORTHY
Rowley (1731-1805), He was a barrister, an MP in the Iris
Parlaiment and died in Dublin.His children were William. Josias,
Samuel Campbell and Joshua.
William and Josias never married; Samuel Campbell married twice,
but no issue from either marriage. Joshua had no issue
Colonel
William Rowley (1732-1807) never married
Sir Joshua
Rowley (1734-1790). He had 10 children 6 sons
and 4 daughters (William was the eldest; Bartholomew Samuel
was the second son (dsp 1817);
Charles was the 4th son)
The William mentioned
is Willliam Rowley 2nd Bart Tendring Hall (1761-1832) Sir Joshua
Rowley's eldest son
There are various branches of
the Rowley family in Shrewsbury, Northampton, London,
Warwickshire and Ireland so your Anthony Rowley might be
descended from one of these branches
Sir Joshua
Rowley of Stoke Suffolk (written 1786, proved 1790)
Mentions wife Dame Sarah Rowley, Sir William Rowley, late
father Sir William Rowley, eldest son William Rowley, son
Bartholomew Samuel Rowley, son Charles Rowley
Comment Les Rowley
The Thomas will is interesting. As he left all his money to
nephews, we infer he had no living descendants. The Anthony
mentioned is almost certainly not our Anthony from the
dates. But he could be related somehow, as there are the two
family christian names occuring
Sir Joshua's will seems to dispell the persistent suggestion that
there was a close connection between the great Sir Joshua
and our Thomas.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Bob Venn, Janice Pond. and Glenis
Crocker, Dr Peter Le Fevre
If you have
additions or corrections to this page, please contact us
Bones in the Belfry home page
Page
last updated - 2025